Su, L., Yan, X., & Zhao, X. (2024). Spatial equity of micromobility systems: A comparison of shared E-scooters and docked bikeshare in Washington DC. Transport Policy, 145, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.10.008

Abstract

• 저소득층 사용 촉진에서 bikeshare system의 equity program이 e-scooter equity program보다 더 효율적으로 보임

 

1. Introduction

• spatial access, unaffordability, lack of digital literacy to access micromobility services, or without a bank account, smartphone, or data plan 때문에 소외계층이 shared micromobility를 이용하지 못하는 경우가 많음
• the equity of micromobility services의 이해는 교통 계획자와 정책 입안자가 서비스 격차를 줄이는 데 중요
• 연구 질문
  1. dockless e-scooter program이 equitable services를 제공하는가?
  2. shared e-scooter services가 docked bikesharing보다 더 equitable한가?

 

2. Literature review

•  

 

3. Analytical framework and methods

•  

 

4. Data

4.1. Shared E-scooter data

• 2019년 6-7월
• public APIs provided by each operator in the General Bikeshare Feed Specification (GBFS) format
• Type 1: 31,570 Lime and Spin trips; Type 2: 216,127 origins and 213,913 destinations of Bird and Lyft

 

4.2. Docked bikeshare data

• Capital Bikeshare's website
• 219,386 trips

 

4.3. Sociodemographic and employment data

• demographic and employment data from ACS and Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD)
•